Financial services

FINRA-grade audit on every agent request.

Banks, broker-dealers, RIAs, and asset managers are the buyers most exposed to agent data leakage and the most regulated in their response. DataDam is the governance layer that makes the answer to your CCO the same as the answer to your auditor.

Pressure

What your CCO is already worried about.

Three exposures every regulated financial firm is carrying into 2026. Each maps to a control that lives or dies at the data layer, not in the model.

MNPI containment is now an agent problem

A research assistant agent that pulls from your CRM and your trading desk shares context across both. Without per-field policy at the data layer, material non-public information will leak into prompts and into vendor logs. The fine for that conversation is not theoretical.

Books and records survived the brokerage. They have to survive the agent.

FINRA Rule 4511 expects every business-bearing communication preserved for six years. An agent that queries account balances, trade history, or client notes is a business communication. Where is your audit log?

Customer PII does not get a vendor exception

GLBA, state privacy law, and your own contracts all forbid sending customer name, SSN, or account number to a third-party LLM in cleartext. The only safe place to mask is upstream of the model.

Workloads

Agents you are already running, governed.

Three patterns we see across every financial-services pilot. The risk column is what happens without a governance layer. The control column is what DataDam adds.

Wealth-management copilot reading client portfolios

Risk without governance

PII (full name, SSN, account number, address) plus position data ships to the model on every turn.

DataDam control

Field-level policy masks PII to the advisor role, generalizes account identifiers, and tokenizes anything the agent needs to reference downstream.

Trade-desk research agent over MNPI databases

Risk without governance

Watch-list, restricted-list, and material deal pipelines bleed into general queries by accident.

DataDam control

Trust scoring per source, kill switch by agent or source, anomaly detection on novel access patterns. One-click stop when something looks wrong.

Compliance triage over CRM and email

Risk without governance

Triage agents need broad read access to find issues, which is exactly the access pattern an exfiltration tool wants.

DataDam control

Immutable audit rollup of every request, decision, and mask. Hash-chained for tamper evidence. Configurable retention to match Rule 4511.

FINRA blueprint

Apply once. Defaults align.

The FINRA blueprint sets a trust threshold of 500 with warn enforcement, tightens the PII confidence threshold to 0.45, and pushes audit retention to six years to match Rule 4511. PII columns mask by default until your contract authors approve broader access per role.

Evidence endpoints export the rollups your auditor asks for, in CSV or JSON, with a stable change log so a re-run produces a reconcilable answer six months later.

Need stricter than FINRA defaults? Override per source. The override only applies where you point it.

Move from board memo to running pilot in two weeks.

The proxy is an OCI image. Drop it in your environment. Connect Postgres, Snowflake, or Salesforce. Apply the FINRA blueprint. Watch agents run inside guardrails you can show your auditor.